'Detroit' review: Well, at least Kathryn Bigelow's latest isn't like 'Zero Dark Thirty'
Connect with us

Reviews

‘Detroit’ review: Well, at least Kathryn Bigelow’s latest isn’t like ‘Zero Dark Thirty’

Published

on

Coming off the second-worst trailer of the year (‘bested’ only by Ready Player One), the marketing for Katheryn Bigelow’s Detroit framed itself as a harrowing political action film, equally callous and righteous. Following 2012’s lauded, abysmal Zero Dark Thirty, Bigelow has orchestrated a jarring, gripping, and plain ensemble piece. Drawing on both the police violence that took place during the Detroit Riots of 1967 at the hotel Algiers and the cinematic techniques of 1967’s Battle of Algiers, the film works better than expected, less outwardly foul and slimy. That being said, there’s nothing particularly exhilarating or sobering about the film, a ferociously composed banality.

Putting aside a bizarre, painted preamble, Bigelow’s film is comprised of three distinct parts; The initial scattershot docudrama gives way to a vivid, grueling, epic case of police violence. Reminiscent of the real-time morality of Compliance, Detroit is better at charting an arc from a situation at the hotel, less explicitly disdainful and gross and unwieldy in its conflations of socio-political standing and dramatic agency. Less effective are the last twenty minutes, which grow didactic, stuck between a coda and charting of the American institutions that foster racism. The film speaks to irresolution and a syncopated doubt, but the rhythms of Mark Boal’s script dictate a neat sense of closure.

The depictions of post-Civil Rights black culture feels researched and educated, but not lived-in or authentic. The slow trickling of key players in the hour-long narrative is equally sloppy and inspired. None of the characters in the film’s first ten minutes wind up in the rest of the film, which is an overcorrection and an improper method of world-building. The barbershop quartet’s opening, cacophonous number is hackneyed and thematically shallow, but hits the core of artistic rebellion in a uniquely accessible context.

The sound design is unreservedly great here – rarely is geography so maintained completely through sound, and Detroit feels modulated within an inch of its life. With the exception of the forever-misused Anthony Mackie, the casting here is stellar. John Boyega is especially fascinating as an Uncle Tom archetype and security guard. Will Poulter gives a fascinating performance about how insufferable he was in We’re the Millers. Yet, the work as a whole flounders, incapable of maintaining more than the passing tight engagement, an allied bet from spectators without a horse in the race. There is no passion in the film’s argument, only the detached arbiter of justice that guides so much privilege towards a twisted sense of conservatism.

Little of the film was actually shot in Detroit, and it looks that way – the movie has little sense of iconic city, or how its people act. Boat’s characters are ciphers for their political narratives, and the drama of the film attempts to both telegraph and undermine their place in history, with little revision or pathos.

The film steps above the bad art of films like Paul Greengrass’s United 93, or the sly propaganda of Bigelow’s war films (it is a surprising but crucial distinction to point out that Detroit is not, functionally, a war film), by being a work that recognizes viscera as a brisque empty vessel that is not inherently political. It is a respectful film propelled by Bigelow’s slick talent as a genre filmmaker, totally removed from indulgence or half-hearted revision. But it is worth calling into question. While certainly not apolitical, the film lacks the urgency and provocation its tension should supply, with its fumbled, soft finale, and trite contextualizations of racially charged violence.

Bigelow is in need of trashier, less self-important work; her messages are overtly tied to the narratives prevalent at the time of a film’s conception, and it’d be interesting to see her take that populist shtick and reign it closer to something knottier, harder to grasp, and less respectable. A film like Detroit requires a level of inquisition that goes beyond accessible journalism. Perhaps that’s why Bigelow’s more political films have never been truly successful. Behind Bigelow’s talent for framing the world through storytelling, she refuses to acknowledge the central truth behind so much social justice; The world is fragile. If you ignore that, nothing feels real enough.

Advertisement
Comments

Reviews

‘Game of Thrones’ finale review: An epic final episode that corrects some major wrongs

Published

on

Game of Thrones finale
HBO

Spoiler warning: this article is for people who have watched the Game of Thrones finale. Do not read on unless you have watched season eight, episode six: The Iron Throne.

And so, at last, after 73 episodes, untold millions of dollars and an estimated 200,000 slayings, it is all over – bar the shouting on the internet. Death came to Game of Thrones and everyone involved in its making threw up their hands and shouted “Yes! Finally! Today!”

We began the finale with Tyrion wandering the ash-strewn ruins of King’s Landing, scene of Daenerys’ handbrake turn into full-blown lunacy last week, lifting fallen bricks and confirming for himself, and viewers still clinging to hope, that the Lannister twins were indeed deceased beneath them. Having the Imp cry “This is an ex-Lannister! If it wasn’t buried under rubble it would be pushing up daisies!” would have been only fractionally less subtle a way to confirm what we all needed confirming before we could get on with the true business of the day; deciding who gets the Iron Throne, who gets to die and who gets a spin-off series.

Daenerys was looking confident about her position, with a jaunty speech to her followers (“Blood of my blood! You have given me the Seven Kingdoms!”) and the speedy arrest of Tyrion for treason. Jon looks pained. Possibly because of the mindless destruction and mass murder carried out by his lover-aunt. Possibly because he’s trying to do a sum involving odd numbers in his head. Dear, sweet, useless Jon. People have berated the writers for many things over the show’s run, but they surely deserve some recognition for managing to sell Kit Harington as a convincing candidate for kingship.

Jon visits Tyrion in prison, where the Last Lannister tries – as Arya does just before – to convince Jon that as a fellow Targaryen with a claim to the throne, the woman atop the dragon might just attempt to do him harm in the near-future. “That’s her decision,” says Dumbo. “She is the queen.” Tyrion adds that she’ll probably go after Sansa and Arya, too, which seems to cause scales to fall from Jon’s eyes, and prompts just about the only bit of action in the finale.

SPOILER

COMING

UP

In this generation’s Buffy/Angel moment, Jon kills Daenerys for the greater good. Drogon makes his feelings about this development clear by melting the Iron Throne with dragon fire and flying off with her corpse. “That’s no good!” shouts Jon after him. “T’throne’s just a symbol. Tha’s got a lot more work to do before tha can usher in an age of representative democracy!” No, he doesn’t. But the actual script doesn’t try much harder. After Jon is arrested offscreen by the Unsullied, the lords and ladies of Westeros convene to decide what must be done. They decide to … choose a ruler from among them. Just like that. Grey Worm, made Dany’s Commander of All War Things in the wake of her dragon nuking King’s Landing, makes no objection. No word on who gets to tell the Dothraki. Bagsy not me.

Samwell wonders whether the people should have a say in who gets to govern them. Oh, but the guffaws can be heard across the Narrow Sea! So that’s that possibility as dead as a White Walker run through with Valyrian steel.

Tyrion nominates –

ANOTHER

SPOILER

COMING

UP

Bran. Or Bran the Broken, as he is dubbed. Westeros is very ableist, as you might have suspected after the six seasons it took for anyone to cobble together a wheelchair for him. It’s a callback to the ancient figure of Bran the Builder, who raised The Wall, founded Winterfell and was the first King of the North, but still. Bran. Bloody Bran. He will rule over only six kingdoms, because Sansa declares the North will become independent once more. Which again, everyone seems fine with. Tyrion becomes Bran’s Hand but Grey Worm insists that Jon be punished by returning to the Night’s Watch. Fair does. Might as well look permanently pained somewhere; it makes sense. And he’ll never realise there’s no reason for the Night’s Watch to exist any more.

Arya is taking a gap year to go travelling “west of Westeros”, an unmapped region rumoured to contain the Mountains of Spin-Off Potential. Our last sight of the whole shebang is Jon setting off into the super-north with the Free Folk.

There’s no doubt this season has been a rushed business. It has wasted opportunities, squandered goodwill and failed to do justice to its characters or its actors. But the finale just about delivered. It was true to the series’ overall subject – war, and the pity of war – and, after doing a lot of wrong to several protagonists last week, did right by those left standing. Whether the million signatories to the petition to remake the entire final season, or the majority of the estimated 45 million around the world due to watch the last episode, will agree – who knows. When you play the Game of Thrones, you win or you die. Overall, I think, it won.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum’ review: A wildly fun kick-shoot-fight-repeat spectacular

Published

on

John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum
LIONSGATE

“Prepare for war,” someone who knows Latin will tell you, if you ask about that subtitle, though it’s hardly necessary intel: In these gloriously dumb—but remarkably well-staged—gun-fu flicks, the war is already here, and it lasts for an entire film.

Maybe others prefer it when Keanu Reeves talks; for me, he’s more effective when he moves. John Wick’s somber suit-clad NYC assassin has become his signature role, stripping down Speed and The Matrix into something John Woo sleek. Mob thugs killed his pet pit bull in the first installment. Those guys are long gone. Though this latest John Wick adventure brings on the usual distractions—Ian McShane’s fastidious boutique-hotel proprietor, Lawrence Fishburne’s booming king of the Bowery underworld, Halle Berry’s lady with vicious dogs that leap straight for the crotch—mostly these characters stay out of the way of the main attraction.

Instead, we’re here for the rigorously conceived, blessedly coherent action showdowns, the work of director Chad Stahelski (also Reeves’s longtime stunt double and choreographer). Stahelski is a fight-scene Fosse and Reeves is his Gwen Verdon: Parabellum takes the hall-of-mirrors high style of the second film and pushes it into overdrive. (Those who live in glass-walled galleries shouldn’t throw anything at Wick.) The level of hard-R-rated bloodletting is so delirious, you’ll ignore how bad it is for you.

A closed Manhattan Bridge is the perfect site for a sword duel on speeding motorcycles. Put Wick on a horse and he’s more of a menace than John Wayne on a grouchy day. In one battle, so many knives are flung, a corpse is used as a pincushion. It’s the golden age of…something—please don’t make us explain it.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘Us’ review: The latest horrifying nightmare from the mind of Jordan Peele is his best one yet

Published

on

Us Jordan Peele
UNIVERSAL PICTURES

A little more than two years after the release of Get Out, the Oscar-winning directorial debut from Jordan Peele that served as a creepy, satirical social commentary about race relations in America, the writer-director is back again with Us, his audacious sophomore effort that so desperately wants us to know that, despite what we may think, we are our own worst enemies.

The film opens with a brief, chilling prologue set in 1986 before fast forwarding to the present day where we meet the Wilsons, an upper-middle-class black family visiting their Santa Cruz beach house for what is expected to be an idyllic summer getaway.

Santa Cruz also happens to be the hometown of Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o), who is as charming as she is overprotective of her family, which includes the fun-loving Gabe (Winston Duke), phone-tethered teenage daughter Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph), and mask-wearing young son Jason (Evan Alex).

Perhaps it’s her motherly instincts that cause her to be the way she is, but it’s probably more so due to the fact that she experienced a traumatizing incident as a child that still continues to haunt her to this day. And you can’t really blame her for that.

So when Gabe offers to take the family to the beach for the day, the site where Adelaide experienced her childhood trauma, she understandably refuses. But after some convincing from Gabe, she agrees to go, but only under the condition that they leave before nightfall.

Oddly enough, though, the moment the Wilsons arrive at the beach, a number of strange events and coincidences begin to unfold; we see a dead body being loaded into the back of an ambulance, a frisbee with a pentagram-like design land perfectly aligned with a polka dot on a beach towel, and a bloodied man standing motionless in the middle of the beach, hands out, as if he’s waiting for someone to come and join him.

These strange occurrences, in addition to Jason wandering off without telling Adelaide, put her on edge. And when the Wilsons arrive home that night, things don’t necessarily get any better. There’s a family standing in their driveway. Four of them. Who is it? It’s the Wilsons themselves.

While the concept of the evil doppelgänger is certainly nothing new to the horror genre, Us always feels wholly fresh and original, and never once dares to fall back on the typical genre tropes or clichés that audiences have grown so very tired of over the years.

Peele’s script, much like the one that won him an Oscar for Get Out, is wickedly smart, funny, and witty, and is packed with so many genuinely shocking surprises that you never fully know for certain when he’s going to be throwing another curve ball your way.

The cast acts it all out in such incredible fashion too, especially when you consider the fact that they’re pulling double duty here with dual performances. Nyong’o is particularly impressive though. Whether she’s playing the charming superheroine that is Adelaide or her terrifying, raspy-voiced doppelgänger, it’s hard not to rank her up there with Toni Collette in Hereditary as one of the best horror performances in recent memory.

By the time the Us is over, things may not be clear right away. And that’s OK. With all of the various imagery and symbolism spread throughout, there’s no doubt that this is a film that demands more than just one repeat viewing. But the main message at the heart of the film is evident, and it’s as important as ever—especially in Trump’s America.

Continue Reading